Retirement 2.0blog

Reduced earnings late in career might not reduce Social Security benefit

Top 35 years of earnings, not final years, determine monthly amount

Jul 1, 2014 @ 12:38 pm

By Mary Beth Franklin

I received a letter from a financial adviser the other day asking about a client who is still working at 63 years old, but who has significantly scaled back his work hours and earnings. She wondered what impact that might have on his future Social Security benefits. I'm sure other advisers have similar questions.

“His estimated benefits statement says that if he continues working until full retirement age, he will receive about $2,500 per month in benefits,” the adviser wrote to me in an e-mail. “But that assumes he will make full salary for the next three years, which he will not,” she wrote. “How can he arrive at a more accurate estimate of his benefits?”

His estimated benefits are close to this year's maximum retirement benefit of $2,642 per month for a worker retiring at age 66 in 2014. That suggests the client is a high earner. Remember, Social Security only counts earnings up to the taxable wage base each year. In 2014, the maximum earnings subject to the Social Security portion of the FICA payroll tax is $117,000. Earnings above that amount don't count in retirement benefit calculation.

“For high-income workers like your client, there probably will be little impact on his Social Security benefits even if he scales back his earnings in his early 60s,” I replied. “Even if he works part time in his final years on the job, his current income probably will still replace earlier lower-earning years when he was flipping burgers or delivering newspapers,” I wrote.

On the other hand, a client with fewer than 35 years of earnings could increase his or her retirement benefits by working a few extra years, replacing any “zero” years in the benefit calculation.

Your client can use Social Security's online retirement estimator to project his retirement benefits. Due to privacy restrictions, you can't do this for him, but you could use the calculator together with him in your office if he agrees. The estimator will let him create “what if” scenarios. For example, he can change his stop work dates or expected future earnings to create and compare different retirement options. But it does not provide annual earnings records.

Social Security benefits are based on your top 35 years of earnings. Your actual earnings are indexed to account for changes in average wages since the year the earnings were received. Any earnings received after age 62 are recorded at face value.

If you're really ambitious, you could take your client's actual earnings listed on his benefits statement and calculate his future benefit by applying the indexing factors for the year he turns 62. A separate index factor is applied to each year of earnings.

Social Security selects those years with the highest indexed earnings — including those earned after age 62 — Those are calculated with an index factor of one. (A year with no earnings is recorded as zero.) It adds those indexed earnings and divides the total amount by 420 — the number of months in 35 years. The result is the worker's average indexed monthly earnings, or AIME.

The final step is to compute his primary insurance amount, or PIA, using the formula explained below.

An individual who first becomes eligible for retirement or disability insurance benefits in 2014, or who dies in 2014 before becoming eligible for benefits, will have a PIA calculated as the sum of 90% of the first $816 of his AIME, plus 32% of his AIME over $816 and through $4,917; plus 15% of his AIME over $4,917.

The percentages are fixed by law, but the dollar amounts in the formula change annually. These dollar amounts are called "bend points."

A person who had maximum taxable earnings in each year since age 22, and who reaches at age 62 in 2014, would have an AIME equal to $8,890, according to an example supplied by Social Security's Office of the Chief Actuary. Based on this AIME amount and the bend points $816 and $4,917, the PIA would equal $2,642.

If the worker in this example collected retirement benefits at the earliest eligible age of 62, he would receive a reduced benefit of $1,982 (75% of his PIA). If he postponed collecting benefits until 70, he would receive $3,487 — a 32% increase due to four years of delayed retirement credits.

You can see that the PIA formula is progressive, tilting 90% of the benefit formula in favor of lower-income workers. For higher earners, additional years of work late in a career might not matter that much. Even if later, higher-earning years replace earlier, lower-earning years, it is likely to affect only the final bend point that includes just 15% of average monthly earnings that exceed $4,917 in the benefit calculation.

(Questions about Social Security? Find the answers in my new ebook available at arjuna-design.com/MBFebook.)

(This story has been updated to correct the total number of months in 35 years to 420.)

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join arjuna-design at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior columnist Bruce Kelly discuss the reasons for the marked shift of advisers between channels, including technology, the DOL fiduciary rule and the broker protocol.

Recommended Video

Channels

Latest news & opinion

Capital Group, sponsor of American Funds, wins 401(k) lawsuit

Decision comes as financial services companies, especially those focused on active management, have been sued for self-dealing.

SEC considers barring aggrieved investors from suing companies

Swept up by pro-business zeitgeist, regulator seeks to reverse two-decade slump in U.S. stock listings.

Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley use contrary tactics to keep advisers

Wells is helping brokers transition to independence within the firm, while Morgan is taking them to court.

Fidelity pushes Vanguard to compete on brand in 401(k) plans

With Fidelity imposing an additional fee, Vanguard likely will look less attractive compared with comparably priced index-fund providers, advisers said.

Goldman's measure of risk appetite hits record

Global stocks and U.S. Treasuries are seeing their most "extreme" start to a year ever, bank says.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at arjuna-design. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting arjuna-design.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist arjuna-design.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

ira to 401k rollover rules vanguard precious metals and mining fund benefits for divorced spouse pimco floating rate strengthsfinder quiz free fidelity oracle how do whole life insurance policies work 401k mandatory distribution rules schwab cds tie cref t rowe price employment widow pension benefits plan services merrill lynch loomis sayles global equity and income fund american century vp capital appreciation fund morgan stanley private wealth management salary first republic bank in san francisco what is the meaning of decant t rowe price retirement fund 2050 what does outperform mean in stocks pros and cons of annuities for retirement income wells fargo bank in dayton ohio vanguard us growth fund investor shares ron white you can t fix stupid full social security benefits statement form ssa-1099 fidelity freedom fund 2015 blackrock lifepath index 2040 jp morgan 401k rollover franklin templeton prices and performance td ameritrade college savings 1910 tobacco baseball cards 401k rollover to roth ira rules great american annuity rates taxation of master limited partnerships