IRA Alert

Ed Slott

Tax traps of non-deductible IRA conversion

Timing is everything when it comes to calculating your clients' taxable income

Jan 31, 2010 @ 12:01 am

By Ed Slott

By now, most financial advisers know that when you have after-tax money in an individual retirement account, you can't just convert those funds and pay no tax on the conversion. Instead, when an IRA is partially converted to a Roth IRA, a prorated amount of after-tax money, or basis, is included with each dollar converted.

The formula for calculating this amount is (total basis in all IRAs/total value of all IRAs) multiplied by the amount converted.

So where is there a tax trap?

Well, unless you wait until the last second and do a conversion Dec. 31, you won't be able to do an exact calculation until the end of the year.

That is because the total value of all IRAs used for the denominator in the pro-rata calculation comes from the balances Dec. 31 of the year of conversion. That could leave some clients paying a little more (or less) in taxes than they originally planned on.

For example, Sally does a Roth conversion Jan. 4. On the date of conversion, the total value of all her IRAs is $50,000, of which $20,000 is after-tax contributions, and $30,000 is pretax contributions and/or earnings.

The tax-free percentage at this point is 40% ($20,000/$50,000 = 0.4), and the remaining 60% is taxable. Sally decides that she would like to convert half the value of her accounts to a Roth.

This might lead you to think that she will have only $15,000 in taxable income from the conversion ($25,000 x 0.6 = $15,000).

But remember, the total value of Sally's IRAs isn't determined until year-end. So let's say that Sally makes some great investments, and by the end of the year, the $25,000 that was left in the traditional IRA (which wasn't converted) has grown to $75,000.

Now the denominator, which includes the converted amount, is increased by the $50,000 increase in account value, so the new tax-free percentage is 20% ($20,000 basis/$100,000 total value of all IRAs at year-end). That means the taxable percentage is 80%.

Instead of $15,000 of taxable income generated from the $25,000 conversion, Sally now has $20,000 of taxable income.

Another big tax trap occurs when clients change the equation by rolling plan money into an IRA in the same year that they make a Roth conversion. When an IRA is converted, only IRA assets are taken into consideration for the pro-rata rule.

Plan assets have no effect.

For example, let's say that Allen has an $50,000 IRA, of which $25,000 is non-deductible contributions and $25,000 is earnings. He also has a 401(k) worth $450,000 (all pretax).

If he converts the entire IRA, he will owe tax only on $25,000, as the plan assets are excluded from the pro-rata formula.

But let's say that Allen changes jobs midyear.

Knowing that IRAs are generally better for clients than company plans, you advise him to roll his 401(k) into an IRA. Like a good client, he listens to your advice right away and rolls the money over.

You just cost Allen thousands in taxes. Why?

Remember, it is the end-of-year IRA balance that determines the denominator for the pro-rata calculation — not the balance on the date that the IRA is converted.

Now, since the 401(k) funds aren't excluded from the calculation, the pro-rata calculation changes dramatically. And instead of owing tax only on $25,000, Allen will now owe tax on $47,500.

The new balance in the IRA at year-end is $500,000 (the $50,000 of IRA funds + the $450,000 of 401(k) funds rolled into the IRA). The denominator for calculating the pro-rata rule now changes from $50,000 to $500,000, making the $25,000 of non-deductible IRA contributions a much lower percentage of the total IRA balance.

The tax-free percentage of the $50,000 conversion thereby goes from 50% to only 5% ($25,000/$500,000 = 0.05), which significantly increases the taxable amount of the conversion. Now the tax-free part of the conversion is only $2,500 (5% of the $50,000), as opposed to the $25,000 (50% of the $50,000) that would have been tax-free without the later 401(k) rollover.

How can Allen avoid this mistake? Simply wait until Jan. 1 of the following year to roll over the funds.

That way, he will have a $0 year-end IRA balance. Of course, if Allen wants to convert his 401(k) to a Roth IRA, this is a non-issue.

Ed Slott, a certified public accountant, created the IRA Leadership Program and Ed Slott's Elite IRA to help advisers and insurance companies become recognized leaders in the IRA marketplace. He can be reached at For archived columns, go to

For archived columns, go to


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Use arjuna-design' to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join arjuna-design at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

All of the noise in the District of Columbia is distracting your clients. Ben Phillips of Event Shares explains what deserves your attention (and what doesn't) as we head into 2018.

Recommended Video


Latest news & opinion

Independent broker-dealers are stepping up their game on recruiting from the wirehouses

Independent broker-dealers have narrowed the gap between themselves and the wirehouses and are able to attract more quality brokers from the Big Four.

Capital Group, sponsor of American Funds, wins 401(k) lawsuit

Decision comes as financial services companies, especially those focused on active management, have been sued for self-dealing.

SEC considers barring aggrieved investors from suing companies

Swept up by pro-business zeitgeist, regulator seeks to reverse two-decade slump in U.S. stock listings.

Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley use contrary tactics to keep advisers

Wells is helping brokers transition to independence within the firm, while Morgan is taking them to court.

Fidelity pushes Vanguard to compete on brand in 401(k) plans

With Fidelity imposing an additional fee, Vanguard likely will look less attractive compared with comparably priced index-fund providers, advisers said.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at arjuna-design. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

401k to rollover ira ssi calculator for disabled child reverse mortgages problems turbotax electronic filing fee 401k retirement plan definition state farm balanced fund td ameritrade college savings templeton mf cfp degree franklin templeton income fund a cola for military retirees wells fargo advantage multi sector income fund spartan us bond index fund institutional class how to cancel medicare part b trustee to trustee transfer vs rollover maryland state income tax rate 2014 how much can i put into my 401k dave ramsey monthly cash flow plan spreadsheet rollover a 401k to an ira social security survivor benefits earnings limit into the breach rode the five hundred social security benefits for ex wives fixed indexed annuities pros and cons wells fargo dealer services bill pay lord abbett funds performance taxation of mlp distributions undervalued small cap stocks annuities vs life insurance american funds europacific growth fund r5 cfa vs cpa salary turbo tax low income t rowe price target retirement max social security earnings best bond mutual fund fidelity american growth fund chartered financial analyst salary